John Richters, JR. Attacking the Myths of Public Speaking: Winning with Individuals and Groups. (The National Underwriter Company)
Saturday, April 30, 2016
Screenplay; by: Syd Field
Introduction
[selected from pp. 1-30]
Movies are a combination of art and science; the
technological revolution has literally changed the way we see movies and
therefore, by necessity, has changed the way we write movies. But no matter
what changes are made in the execution of the material, the nature of the
screenplay is the same as it has always been: A screenplay is a story told with pictures, in dialogue and description, and placed
within the context of dramatic structure. That's what it is; that is its
nature. It is the art of visual storytelling.
The
craft of screenwriting is a creative process that can be learned. To tell a
story, you have to set up your characters, introduce the dramatic premise (what the story is about)
and the dramatic situation
(the circumstances
surrounding the action), create obstacles for your characters to confront and overcome, then resolve the story. You know, boy meets girl, boy gets girl, boy loses girl. All
stories, from Aristotle through all the constellations of civilization, embody
the same dramatic principles.
In
Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring, Frodo becomes the ring bearer to
return the ring to its place of origin, Mount Doom, so he can destroy it. That
is his dramatic need. How he gets there and completes the task is the story.
Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring sets up the characters and
situation and narrative through line; it establishes Frodo and the Shire, as
well as the Fellowship, who set off on their mission to Mount Doom. Part II,
The Two Towers, dramatizes the obstacles Frodo, Sam, and the Fellowship
confront on their journey to destroy the ring. They are confronted with
obstacle after obstacle that hinder their mission. At the same time, Aragorn
and the others must overcome many challenges to defeat the Ores at Helms Deep.
And Part III, The Return of the King, resolves the story: Frodo and Sam reach
Mount Doom and watch as the ring and the Gollum fall into the fires and are
destroyed. Aragorn is crowned king, and the hobbits return to the Shire and
their life plays out.
Set-up, confrontation, and resolution.
It
is the stuff of drama. I learned this when I was a kid sitting in a darkened
theater, popcorn in hand, gazing in awe and wonder at the images projected on
the white river of light reflected on that monster screen.
ACT I IS THE
SET-UP
If a screenplay is a story told with pictures,
then what do all stories have in common? A beginning, middle, and end, though
not necessarily, as mentioned, in that order; it is a story told in pictures,
in
dialogue and description, and placed within the
context of dramatic structure.
Aristotle talked about the three unities of
dramatic action: time, place, and action. The normal Hollywood film is
approximately two hours long, or 120 minutes; foreign films tend to be a little
shorter, though that's changing as we bridge the language of international
film. But in most cases, films are approximately two hours in length, give or
take a few minutes. This is a standard length, and today, when a contract is
written in Hollywood between the filmmaker and production company, it states
that when the movie is delivered, it will be no longer than 2 hours and 8
minutes. That's approximately 128 pages of screenplay. Why? Because it's an
economic decision that has evolved over the years. At this writing, it costs
approximately $10,000 to $12,000 per minute (and getting higher and higher
every year) to shoot a Hollywood studio film. Second, a two-hour movie has a
definite advantage in the theaters simply because you can get in more viewings
of the movie per day. More screenings mean more money; more theaters mean more
screenings, which means more money will be made. Movies are show business, after all, and with the cost of moviemaking
being so high, and getting higher as our technology evolves, today it's really
more business than show.
The way it breaks down is this: One page of
screenplay is approximately one minute of screen time. It doesn't matter
whether the script is all action, all dialogue, or any combination of the two—
generally speaking, a page of screenplay equals a minute of screen time. It's a
good rule of thumb to follow. There are exceptions to this, of course. The
script of Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring is only 118 pages, but the
movie is more than three hours long.
Act I, the beginning, is a unit of dramatic
action that is approximately twenty or thirty pages long and is held together
with the dramatic context known as the SetUp. Context is the space that holds something in place—in this case, the content.
For example, the space inside a glass is the context; it holds the content in place— whether it's water, beer, milk,
coffee, tea, or juice. If we want to get creative, a glass can also hold
raisins, trail mix, nuts, grapes, etc.— but the space inside doesn't change The
context is what holds the content in place.
In this unit of dramatic action, Act I, the screenwriter sets up the story,
establishes character, launches the dramatic premise (what the story is about), illustrates the situation (the circumstances surrounding the action),
and creates the relationships between the main character and the other characters who
inhabit the landscape of his or her world. As a writer you've only got about ten minutes to establish
this, because the audience members can usually determine, either consciously or
unconsciously, whether
they do or don't like the movie by that time. If they don't know what's going on and the opening is vague
or boring, their concentration
and focus
will falter
and start wandering.
Check it out. The next time you go to a movie,
do a little exercise: Find out how long it takes you to make a decision about
whether you like the film or not. A good indication is if you start thinking
about getting something from the refreshment stand or find yourself shifting in your seat; if that happens, the chances
are the filmmaker has lost you as a viewer. Ten minutes is ten pages of
screenplay. I cannot emphasize enough that this first ten-page unit of dramatic
action is the most important part of the screenplay.
In
American Beauty (Alan Ball), after the brief
opening video scene of the daughter Jane (Thora Birch) and her boyfriend, Ricky
(Wes Bentley), we see the street where Lester Burnham (Kevin Spacey) lives, and
hear his first words in voice-over: "My name is Lester Burnham. I'm
forty-two years old. In less than a year, I'll be dead _ In a way, I'm dead
already." Then we see Lester as he begins his day. He wakes, and then we
see his relationship with his family. All this is set up and established within
the first few pages, and we learn that: "My wife and daughter think I'm
this gigantic loser, and they're right I have lost something. I don't know what it was,
but I have lost something _ I feel sedated But you know, it's never too late to get
it
back." And that lets us know what the
story is all about: Lester regaining the life he has lost or given up, and
becoming whole and complete again as a person. Within the first few pages of
the screenplay we know the main character, the dramatic premise, and the
situation.
In Lord of the Rings: The
Fellowship of the Ring (Fran Walsh, Philippa Boyens, and Peter
Jackson, based on the book by J. R. R. Tolkien), we learn in the first six pages of the screenplay the history of the ring
and its magnetic
attraction. It's a beautiful opening that sets up all three stories. It
also sets up the story as Gandalf arrives in the Shire. We meet Frodo (Elijah
Wood), Bilbo Baggins (Ian Holm), Sam (Sean Astin), and the others, see how they
live, and are introduced to the ring. We also get an overview of Middle Earth.
This opening sets up the rest of the Fellowship, including the two sequels, The Two Towers and Return of the King.
ACT II IS CONFRONTATION
Act
II is a unit of dramatic action approximately sixty pages long, and goes from
the end of Act I, anywhere from pages 20 to 30, to the end of Act II,
approximately pages 85 to 90, and is held together with the dramatic context
known as Confrontation. During this second act the main character encounters
obstacle after obstacle that keeps him/her from achieving
his/her dramatic need, which is defined as what the
character wants to win, gain, get, or achieve
during the course of the screenplay. If you know your character's dramatic need, you can create obstacles to it and then
your story becomes your character, overcoming obstacle after obstacle to
achieve his/her dramatic need.
In Cold Mountain, Inman
(Jude Law) struggles over
two hundred miles to
return home to Cold Mountain. This dramatic need is both internal and external: It is Inman's longing to return
to a place in his heart
that existed prior to the war, and Cold Mountain is also the place where he
lived and grew up, as well as where his loved one, Ada (Nicole Kidman), resides. His desire, his dramatic need to return home,
is fraught with obstacle after obstacle, and still he persists, only to fail at
the end. Literally, the
entire movie is overcoming
the obstacles of war and the internal will to survive.
In Chinatown, a detective story, Act II
deals with Jake Gittes's
collisions with people
who try to keep him from
finding out who's responsible for the murder of Hollis Mulwray and who's
behind the water scandal. The obstacles that Gittes encounters and overcomes
dictate the dramatic action of the story. Look at The
Fugitive. The entire story is driven
by the main character's dramatic need to bring his wife's killer to justice. Act II is
where your character has to deal with surviving the obstacles that you put in
front of him or her. What
is it that drives him or her forward through the action? What does your main character
want? What is
his or her dramatic need? In Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers, the entire film involves
Frodo, Sam, and the Fellowship's confronting and managing to overcome obstacle
after obstacle, leading to
the climactic battle at Helms Deep.
All
drama
is conflict.
Without conflict,
you have no action; without action, you have no character; without character,
you have no story;
and without story,
you have no screenplay.
ACT III IS
RESOLUTION
Act III is a unit of dramatic action
approximately twenty to thirty pages long and goes from the end of Act II,
approximately pages 85 to 90, to the end of the screenplay. It is held together
with the dramatic context known as Resolution. I think it's important to
remember that resolution
does not mean ending; resolution means solution. What is the solution of your
screenplay? Does your main
character live
or die? Succeed or fail? Get married or
not? Win the race or not? Win the election or not? Escape safely or not? Leave
her husband or not? Return home safely or not? Act III is that unit of action that resolves the story. It is not the ending; the ending is that specific scene or shot or sequence that ends the script.
Beginning, middle, and end; Act I, Act II, Act
III. Set-Up, Confrontation, Resolution—these parts make up the
whole. It is the
relationship between these parts that determines the whole.
But this brings up another question: If these
parts make up the whole, the screenplay, how do you get from Act I, the Set-Up, to Act II, the Confrontation? And how do you get from Act
II to Act III, the Resolution7. The answer is to create a Plot
Point at the end of both Act I and Act II.
A Plot
Point
is defined as any incident, episode, or event that hooks into the action and
spins it around in another direction—in this case, Plot Point I
moves the action forward into Act II and Plot Point II moves the action into
Act III. Plot Point I occurs at the end of Act I, anywhere from pages 20 to 25
or 30.
A Plot
Point
is always a function of the
main character. In Lord of the Rings: The
Fellowship of the Ring, Plot
Point I
is the beginning of the
journey, that moment when Frodo and Sam leave the Shire and set out on their adventure through Middle
Earth. Plot Point II
is when the Fellowship
reaches Lothlorien, and Galadriel (Cate Blanchett) reveals to Frodo the
fate of Middle Earth should the ring not reach Mount Doom. Frodo becomes the reluctant hero, in
much the same way that Neo
(Keanu Reeves) in The Matrix (Larry and Andy Wachowski), accepts his mantle of
responsibility at Plot
Point 1: his
journey as "The
One” begins
at Plot Point I. It
is the true beginning
of that story.
If we take a look at The Matrix, we can see Plot Points I and II clearly
delineated. In Plot Point
I, Neo chooses the
Red Pill, and Act II
begins when he is literally reborn; at Plot
Point II, Neo and
Trinity (Carrie-Anne Moss) rescue Morpheus (Laurence Fishburne), and only then does Neo accept the truth that
he is "The One.”
Plot Points serve an essential purpose in the
screenplay; they are a major story progression and keep the story line anchored
in place. In Chinatown, Jake Gittes is hired by the wife of a prominent man to find out if her husband is having an affair. Gittes follows him and sees him with a young girl.
That's the Set-Up.
Plot Point I occurs
after the newspaper story
is released claiming Mr.
Mulwray has been caught in a "love nest." That's when the real Mrs. Mulwray shows up with her attorney and threatens to sue Jake Gittes and have his
license revoked. If she is the real Mrs. Mulwray, who was the woman who hired Jake Gittes? And why did she hire him? And who hired the phony Mrs. Mulwray? And why. The arrival of the real Mrs. Mulwray is what hooks into the action and spins it around in another
direction—in this case, Act II. It is story
progression; Jake
Gittes must find
out who set him up,
and why. The
answer is the
rest of the movie.
In Cold Mountain, as Inman recovers from his wounds
he receives a letter
from Ada. We hear her say, in voice-over, "Come back to me. Come
back to me is my request." Inman nods; his decision is made: He will desert the Confederate Army and return home to Ada and Cold Mountain,
return to the place in his heart.
Plot
Points
do not have to be big, dynamic scenes or
sequences; they can be quiet scenes in which a decision is made, such as
Inman's, or when Frodo and Sam leave the Shire. Take the sequence in American Beauty where Lester Burnham and his wife are at the high school
basketball game and see
their daughter's friend Angela (Mena Suvari) performing at halftime. It moves the story forward
and sets Lester's
emotional journey of liberation in motion. In The Matrix, Plot Point I
is where Neo is offered
the choice of the Red Pill or the Blue Pill. He chooses the Red Pill, and this truly is the beginning of the story.
All of
Act I has set up the
elements and led Neo to this moment.
Remember, the paradigm is the form of a screenplay, what it looks like. Any page
numbers I reference are only a guideline to indicate approximately where the story progresses to the next level, not how it progresses. How you do that is up to you.
It is the form of the screenplay that is important, not the page numbers where
Plot Points occur. There may be many Plot Points during the course of the story
line; I only focus on Plot Points I and II because these two events
are the anchoring moments that become the foundation of the dramatic
structure in the screenplay.
Plot Point II is really the same as Plot Point
I; it is the way to move the story forward, from Act II to Act III. It is a
story progression. As mentioned, it usually occurs anywhere between pages 80 or
90 of the screenplay. In Chinatown, Plot Point II occurs when Jake Gittes finds a pair of horn-rim glasses
in the pond where Hollis Mulwray was murdered, and knows the glasses belonged
either to Mulwray or to the person who killed him.
This leads us
to the Resolution of the story.
In Cold Mountain, Plot Point II is a quiet
moment; after Inman meets
the woman Sara (Natalie Portman) and rescues her and her baby from the Northerners, he
reaches a point where he can see the Blue Ridge Mountains. The script reads:
"Somewhere in there is home, is Ada. He goes on." That's all; such a
small scene, but loaded with such emotion: He's home. That leads us into Act III, the Resolution.
Do all good screenplays fit the paradigm? Yes. But just
because a screenplay is well structured and fits the paradigm doesn't make it a
good screenplay, or a good movie. The paradigm is a form, not a formula. Structure is what holds the story together.
What's the distinction between form and formula? The form of a coat or jacket, for
example, is two arms, a front, and a back. And within that form of arms, front,
and back you can have any variation of style, fabric, color, and size—but the
form remains intact.
A formula, however, is totally different. A formula never varies; certain
elements are put together so they come out exactly the same each and every time. If you put that coat on an assembly line, every coat will be
exactly the same, with the same
pattern, the same fabric,
the same color, the same cut, the same
material. The coat does not change, except for the size. A screenplay, on the other
hand, is unique, a totally individual presentation.
The paradigm is a form, not a formula; it's what holds the story
together. It is the spine, the skeleton. Story determines structure; structure
doesn't determine story.
The
dramatic structure of the screenplay maybe denned as a linear arrangement of
related incidents, episodes, or events leading to a dramatic resolution.
How you utilize these structural components
determines the form of your screenplay. The Hours (David Hare, adapted from
the novel by Michael Cunningham) is told in three different time periods and
has a definite structure. It's the same with American Beauty: The whole story is told in
flashback, just like Woody Allen's Annie Hall. Cold Mountain is also told in flashback,
but has a definite beginning, middle, and end. Citizen Kane is also told in flashback,
but this does not detract from its form.
The paradigm is a model, an example, or a
conceptual scheme; it is what a well-structured screenplay looks like, an
overview of the story line as it unfolds from beginning to end.
Screenplays that work follow the paradigm. But
don't take my word for it. Go to a movie and see whether you can determine its
structure for yourself.
Some of you may not believe that. You may not
believe in beginnings, middles, and ends, either. You may say that art, like
life, is nothing more than several individual "moments" suspended in
some giant middle, with no beginning and no end, what Kurt Vonnegut calls
"a series of random moments" strung together in a haphazard fashion.
I disagree.
Birth? Life? Death? Isn't that a beginning,
middle, and end? Spring, summer, fall, and winter—isn't that a beginning,
middle, and end? Morning, afternoon, evening—it's always the same, but different.
Think about the rise and fall of great ancient civilizations— Egyptian, Greek,
and Roman, each rising from the seed of a small community to the apex of power,
then disintegrating and dying.
Think about the birth and death of a star, or
the beginning of the universe. If there's a beginning, like the Big Bang, is
there going to be an end?
Think about the cells in our bodies. How often
are they replenished, restored, and re-created? Every seven years—within a
sevenyear cycle all the cells in our bodies are born, function, die, and are
reborn again.
Think about the first day of a new job, or a
new school, or a new house or apartment; you'll meet new people, assume new
responsibilities, create new friendships.
Screenplays are no different. They have a definite beginning,
middle, and
end, but not
necessarily in that order.
If you don't believe the paradigm, or in the
three-act structure first laid down by Aristotle, go check it out. Go to a
movie—go see several movies—and see whether they fit the paradigm or not.
If you're interested in writing screenplays,
you should be doing this all the time. Every movie you see is a learning
process, expanding your awareness and comprehension of what a movie is: a story
told with pictures.
You should also read as many screenplays as
possible in order to expand your awareness of the form and structure. Many
screenplays have been reprinted in book form and most bookstores have them, or
can order them. You can also go online and do a Google search under "screenplays"
and find a number of sites that allow you to download screenplays. Some are
free, some you pay for.
I have my students read and study scripts like Chinatown, Network (Paddy Chayefsky), American Beauty, The Shawshank Redemption (Frank Darabont), Sideways (Alexander Payne and Jim Taylor), The Matrix, Annie Hall, and Lord of the Rings. These scripts are excellent
teaching aids. If they aren't available, read any screenplay you can find. The
more the better.
The paradigm works. It is the foundation of every good screenplay, the foundation of dramatic structure.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)









































